a brief history of a community newspaper and beneficiaries group
Both SMOG and BAC had their origins in the April 1997 national anarchist
conference in Wellington. Following that conference, a small group of
Christchurch anarchists set up the Anarchist Round Table (the name is
a piss-take of the Business Roundtable). ART used to meet every one or
two weeks, but after six months or so it became apparent that we weren't
getting very far. We were stuck in the old anarchist ghetto.
from art to bac to smog
Like
many anarchist groups, we spent many wasted hours stewing over ways to
break out. Some of us lived or worked in the Inner City East, a working
class area of Christchurch, and so we decided to establish a small neighbourhood
newspaper with an anarchist bent. We formed a new group with a few sympathetic
non-anarchists on board, and in December 1997 we published the first issue
of SMOG. We produced 3000 copies of the paper each month and did everything
ourselves, from writing articles (we also received a lot of contributions
from residents), and laying the thing out to printing, folding, and then
stuffing the finished product in letterboxes. We covered our costs by
carrying advertising from local businesses.
There were never more than six to eight people involved in the core group,
although quite a few others helped out with the folding and distribution.
A lot of the people living in the area were beneficiaries, and the paper
covered issues of concern to them and other low-income residents. As time
went on, the SMOG group became more and more involved in activist work
on beneficiary issues, and so in the middle of 1998 a decision was made
to form a separate group to distinguish this activity from the newspaper
work. This new group was the Beneficiary Action Collective (BAC).
By this stage, ART had been left behind and was no longer meeting as a
separate group. SMOG also suffered as we became more and more involved
in activist work. It was always a struggle to involve new people, and
so we were often overstretched. Direction was also a problem.
|
CONTENTS
from argentina to aotearoa
anti-capitalist uprising
in argentina: an analogy
organising against capitalism
in the 21st century
conference report
anarchy in the r.k
bac to smog
the 24 milion dollar minute
war is terrorism
aotearoa news round up
|
|
workfare?? hell no!!
However,
SMOG and BAC still achieved some positive results. A total of 22 issues
of SMOG were published over a period of just over two years. BAC helped
organise several high profile and successful actions, including a public
burning of copies of Jenny and Winston's infamous Code of Social Responsibility
in Cathedral Square. The group also carried out hit-and-run raids on Income
Support and Employment Services offices if we heard about beneficiaries
getting badly treated. A number of us would storm into the office and
present the manager with a huge Bastard of the Month certificate. The
event would then be covered in the pages of SMOG, often with a photo of
the hapless "victim"!
In October 1998, BAC joined forces with the Enough is Enough group (based
around Christchurch CORSO) to organise a protest against the introduction
of the Community Wage, or workfare. Several hundred people attended the
demo, and we briefly occupied the High Street WINZ office in central Christchurch
before marching down to the City Council offices. Coverage of this event
in SMOG featured a priceless photo of WINZ manager David Rhodes smiling
as he accepts a huge Bastard of the Year certificate on behalf of Work
and Income Minister Peter McCardle. This was not the last time David was
the butt of our humour.
SMOG was also very active on neighbourhood issues. One of these was the
demolition of a community art gallery and other buildings on Gloucester
Street to make way for a council housing unit. Although we eventually
lost this battle, our involvement in helping to organise a spirited occupation
and protest made sure mayoral candidate Garry Moore and other councillors
ended up with plenty of egg on their faces.
going potty outside winz
.Another high-profile campaign organised by BAC was over access to toilets
at the High Street WINZ office. This was around the time when Christine
Rankin had taken over, and WINZ was chucking money everywhere. Yet they
couldn't find a way to allow beneficiaries waiting for interviews access
to the toilets! We started by staging occupations of the High Street office,
on one occasion even delivering our own homemade WINZ-a-loo! All of us
were eventually served trespass notices, so we then settled into a routine
of weekly pickets outside the office. These usually featured a good dose
of toilet humour, dressing up and, in the spirit of the Wobblies, lots
of sing-alongs. We had good coverage on the local TV stations (not to
mention in SMOG), and even the ultra-conservative Christchurch Press ran
the odd story about us, although this usually consisted of reprinting
WINZ press releases. But in the end we failed to get what we wanted and
the strain on the group was beginning to show.
As I mentioned earlier, the core group never numbered more than six to
eight people. We tried to make decisions on a consensus basis, and this
mostly worked. However, we failed to keep some strong personalities in
check, especially at our meetings, and this perhaps put new people off.
So we never had a strong platform to work from, relying on other groups
for meeting spaces and resources. This was sometimes difficult, especially
as we fell out with some groups over our uncompromising attitude towards
the Community Wage. Many community groups wanted to - and did - use this
abhorrent scheme.
|
group dynamics - a real problem
However, our real problem was group dynamics and a lack of conflict
resolution processes. We never really sorted this out, and as we were
basically an affinity group, when friends stopped being friends, that
was it. If we had devoted more time to establishing processes and learnt
to say "no" collectively to some people, things may have been
different.
BAC and SMOG both folded in May 2000. By this time ART had long ceased
to exist as a separate identity. This was a mistake, as it took some time
for us to get an anarchist group going again, and in many ways we had
to start from scratch. However, after six months or so of recharging our
batteries, ART was resuscitated, and is in many ways a stronger, more
focused group. Hopefully we can use some of the lessons we learnt from
our experiences in SMOG and BAC to ensure we don't repeat the mistakes
of the past.
- Frank
|
 |